Legal Opinion

Weeks v. Merkle

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 18, 1898PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Error from the District Court of Cleveland County; before J. R. Keaton, District Judge. Action by John Merlde against R. J. Weeks to recover land. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

Dark, C. J.:

The defendant in error, John Merlde, brought suit in the district court of Cleveland county lor the recovery of lot 4, block 72, in the city of Norman, alleging that he was the owner of said lot, and that an illegal tax deed had been issued therefor to R. J. Weeks, plaintiff in error, pursuant to a sale of said lot for delinquent taxes for the year 1891. Weeks answered in the district court to the action, by alleging ownership based upon the tax deed. The deed under which Weeks claims the lot is as follows:

“Whereas, R. J. Weeks did on the 24th day of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Magill v. MartinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1874
  2. Norton v. FriendSupreme Court of Kansas · 1874
  3. Spicer v. HoweSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Page v. GillettSupreme Court of Colorado · 1910
  2. Cochran v. SullivanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. Hatchett v. GoingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  4. Winters v. BirchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  5. Wilson v. WoodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1900

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API