Legal Opinion
Orfanos v. California Insurance Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 9, 1938No. Civ. 2006PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.
Under date of January 31, 1930, plaintiff bought, on a conditional sales contract, from Harbor Motors Company, owned by Haría High, a three-ton Reo truck for $3,117.46. This price included insurance and carrying charges. The contract was immediately transferred to the C. I. T. Corporation. It contained the following:
“I or we hereby appoint you, or in the event that this contract is assigned, then the assignee thereof, my or our attorney in fact for me or us to collect, compromise, receipt for or discharge on such terms as such attorney in fact may deem advisable, any insurance for loss,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Blasingame v. Home Ins. Co. of City of N.Y.California Supreme Court · 1888
- Dennis v. Union Mutual Life Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1890
- McPhetridge v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Carr v. International Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1922
- Troendle v. ClinchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
3Cited by4 opinions
- Michelson v. HamadaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Jolton v. Minster Graf & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
- H. Moffat Co. v. RosascoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Chodur v. EdmondsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985