Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Moussazadeh

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided December 19, 2001No. 74,185PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COCHRAN, J.,

delivered the Court’s opinion,

joined by KELLER, P.J., and MEYERS, WOMACK, KEASLER, and HERVEY, JJ.

Applicant in this habeas corpus proceeding contends that his counsel’s erroneous advice regarding parole eligibility 1 rendered applicant’s guilty plea involuntary. Applicant first argues that his plea agreement with the State implicitly incorporated a (mistaken) understanding of his parole eligibility. He further argues that, even if the plea agreement did not implicitly incorporate this mistaken understanding of his parole eligibility, his plea was still involuntary because…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Sun Oil Co. (Delaware) v. MadeleyTexas Supreme Court · 1981
  2. HECI Exploration Co. v. NeelTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Ex Parte AdamsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  4. Ortiz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  5. Danciger Oil & Refining Co. v. PowellTexas Supreme Court · 1941

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. In the Interest of H.R.M.Texas Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Ex Parte MoussazadehCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2012
  3. Moore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009
  4. Ramirez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2002
  5. Deleon, Ex Parte JesusCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2013

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API