Legal Opinion

Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 9, 1998No. 32 W.D. Appeal Docket 1996PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ZAPPALA, Justice.

The issue presented is whether a claimant is entitled to receive worker’s compensation benefits for a pre-existing non-work related condition when the claimant has fully recovered from any work-related injury caused by an aggravation of that condition. We find that a claimant is not eligible for worker’s compensation benefits under such circumstances.

Joseph Baxter, a 31-year old welder employed by Bethlehem Steel Corporation, suffers from asthma. He was diagnosed with asthma during his childhood. While employed as a welder, Baxter suffered from breathing problems when…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Unora v. Glen Alden Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  3. Pawlosky v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Republic Steel Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Farquhar v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. McCabe v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Giant Eagle, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Cruz v. Workers Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Sharkey v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  5. Reinforced Molding Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API