Legal Opinion
Reinforced Molding Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided September 10, 1998PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FLAHERTY, Judge.
Reinforced Molding Corporation (Employer) petitions for review from an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed the order of the Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) that granted benefits to David Haney (Haney or Claimant). We affirm.
The WCJ made the following pertinent findings of fact:
a. The claimant, David Haney III, was employed as a machine operator with the employer from July of 1989 until April 16, 1991.
c. The claimant, during his employment, was exposed to liquid and vapor styrene as part of his work duties.
d. The claimant was given no skin…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Lewis v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Barrett v. Otis Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- American Refrigerator Equipment Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Farquhar v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Vista International Hotel v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (Daniels)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Kurtz v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Waynesburg College)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Chik-Fil-A v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- McCabe v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- County of Allegheny v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.