Legal Opinion
Reese v. Stroh
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided June 13, 1994No. 33128-1-IPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAgid, J.
William Foster Reese and Frances Reese (the Reeses) brought this medical malpractice action against Dr. James E. Stroh, Jr., alleging that he negligently failed to treat Mr. Reese’s emphysema condition with a protein replacement therapy called Prolastin. The Reeses contend that the trial court erred in excluding their expert medical witness testimony on the basis that it lacked sufficient foundation to go to the jury. We reverse.
I
Facts
William Reese (Reese) was born in 1938. In 1984, Reese began seeing Dr. Stephen Aprill for treatment of asthma. One year later, Dr. Aprill referred Reese to Dr.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- Beech Aircraft Corp. v. RaineySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Jules R. Viterbo, Et Ux, (Patricia Viterbo) v. The Dow Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- People v. McDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Reese v. StrohWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- Anderson v. AKZO NOBEL COATINGS, INC.Washington Supreme Court · 2011
- Williams v. HedicanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1997
- Sorensen v. Shaklee CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- Sorensen ex rel. Dunbar v. Shaklee Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.