Legal Opinion

Colonial Insurance Co. of California v. Minnesota Assigned Risk Plan

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 29, 1990No. C5-90-108PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EDWARD D. MULALLY, Judge.

Appellant Colonial Insurance Company brought this action against Minnesota Assigned Risk Plan and the St. Hilaire Co-op Elevator, seeking reimbursement of no- fault benefits paid on behalf of Richard Miller, an employee of St. Hilaire. The trial court concluded that Colonial had no standing to bring an action for reimbursement and dismissed the action. Colonial appeals from the judgment of dismissal. We affirm.

FACTS

Richard Miller was injured in an automobile accident on July 16, 1987. At the time of the accident, Miller was on his way to Bejou, Minnesota for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Karst v. FC Hayer Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  2. Record v. Metropolitan Transit CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  3. Freeman v. Armour Food Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  4. Tatro v. Hartmann's StoreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Klinefelter v. Crum & Forster Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
  2. American Family Insurance Group v. UdermannCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
  3. David L. Henson as Trustee for the Estate of Maxwell David Henson v. Uptown Drink, LLC, and Third Party v. Jason Alan Sunby, Third PartyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
  4. State Farm Insurance Companies v. Jolene WuorenmaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API