Legal Opinion

in Re City of Dallas

Texas Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 2016No. 15-0794PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Per curiam

Rule 202 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure allows a court to authorize depositions “to investigate a potential claim or suit.” Tex. R. Civ. P. 202.1(b). In this case, the City of Corsicana, Navarro County, and Navarro College (collectively “Navarro”) filed a Rule 202 petition in the County Court at Law of Navarro County to investigate a potential tortious interference claim against the City of Dallas. The county court denied Dallas’s immunity-based plea to the jurisdiction, granted Navarro’s Rule 202 petition, and authorized depositions. In an opinion disposing of Dallas’s interlocutory…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bland Independent School District v. BlueTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  2. University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. LoutzenhiserTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  3. M.O. Dental Lab v. RapeTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Tune v. Texas Department of Public SafetyTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  5. In Re WolfeTexas Supreme Court · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. In re CoppolaTexas Supreme Court · 2017
  2. City of Westworth Village, Texas v. City of White Settlement, Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2018
  3. Hous. Indep. Sch. Dist. v. DurrellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2018
  4. Apache Corporation v. Cathryn C. Davis, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2019
  5. Aderoneke Aderemi v. Massandra KV Vineyards Owner, LLC, Individually and as Succeddor in Interest to PAC Vineyards, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2026

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API