In re Coppola
Texas Supreme Court
1Per curiam
In this tort suit arising from a real-estate transaction, relators Frank and Bridget Coppola seek mandamus relief from an order denying leave to designate the plaintiffs’- transactional attorneys as responsible third parties. The motion to designate, which was filed long after an initial trial date but more than sixty days before a new trial setting, was timely. See Tex. Civ. Prac.& Rem. Code § 33.004. Trial courts have no discretion to deny a timely filed motion to designate absent a pleading, defect and an opportunity to cure, which did not occur here. See id. We therefore conditionally…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- In Re McAllen Medical Center, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2008
- Waco Independent School District v. GibsonTexas Supreme Court · 2000
- Rusk State Hospital v. BlackTexas Supreme Court · 2012
- Matthew Lippincott and Creg Parks v. Warren WhisenhuntTexas Supreme Court · 2015
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by112 opinions
- In re DawsonTexas Supreme Court · 2018
- American K-9 Detection Services, LLC and Hill Country Dog Center, Llc v. Latasha FreemanTexas Supreme Court · 2018
- In re MolinaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2019
- In re Dakota Directional Drilling, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2018
- in Re: Ashley Scott Echols, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2018
107 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.