Legal Opinion

In re Coppola

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 2017No. 16-0723PublishedCited by 112 opinions

1Per curiam

In this tort suit arising from a real-estate transaction, relators Frank and Bridget Coppola seek mandamus relief from an order denying leave to designate the plaintiffs’- transactional attorneys as responsible third parties. The motion to designate, which was filed long after an initial trial date but more than sixty days before a new trial setting, was timely. See Tex. Civ. Prac.& Rem. Code § 33.004. Trial courts have no discretion to deny a timely filed motion to designate absent a pleading, defect and an opportunity to cure, which did not occur here. See id. We therefore conditionally…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. In Re McAllen Medical Center, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Waco Independent School District v. GibsonTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Rusk State Hospital v. BlackTexas Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Matthew Lippincott and Creg Parks v. Warren WhisenhuntTexas Supreme Court · 2015

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by112 opinions

  1. In re DawsonTexas Supreme Court · 2018
  2. American K-9 Detection Services, LLC and Hill Country Dog Center, Llc v. Latasha FreemanTexas Supreme Court · 2018
  3. In re MolinaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2019
  4. In re Dakota Directional Drilling, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2018
  5. in Re: Ashley Scott Echols, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2018

107 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API