Legal Opinion

Peterson v. City of Minneapolis

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 3, 1928No. 26,814PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1 Reported in 221 N.W. 14. Appeal from three orders in condemnation proceedings.

The city of Minneapolis, pursuant to its home rule charter which incorporated as a part thereof the state Elwell road law, instituted condemnation proceedings to acquire lands for widening Grant street in said city (home rule charter, c. XX; G. S. 1923, §§ 1522-1566; L. 1925, p. 676, c. 417). On May 14, 1926, the city council adopted a proper resolution and appointed commissioners to make an award of damages and assessment of benefits relative to the property to be affected by said proceedings. This included "the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kafka v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  2. Eyre v. City of FaribaultSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  3. Smith v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  4. State ex rel. Kafka v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  5. State Ex Rel. City of Minneapolis v. BoucherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ulmen v. SchwiegerMontana Supreme Court · 1932
  2. State, by Lord v. FrisbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  3. State v. RustSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  4. State v. RadosevichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  5. State, by G. A. Youngquist v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API