Zauderer v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel of the Supreme Court of Ohio
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the Court 1
471 U.S. 626 (1985)
ZAUDERER
v.
OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL OF THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
No. 83-2166.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued January 7, 1985
Decided May 28, 1985
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
Alan B. Morrison argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs were David C. Vladeck and David K. Frank.
H. Bartow Farr III argued the cause for appellee. On the brief were Angelo J. Gagliardo and Mark H. Aultman.[*]
2Opinion of the Court · WhiteJustice White
Since the decision in Virginia Pharmacy Board v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc., 425 U. S. 748 (1976), in which the Court held for the first time that the…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Brennan; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · O'Connor.
3Cases cited57 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by8 opinions
- Nationwide Biweekly Administration, Inc. v. OwenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Ctia - the Wireless Ass'n v. City of BerkeleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Jerry Beeman & Pharmacy Services, Inc. v. Anthem Prescription Management, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Nat'l Ass'n of Wheat Growers v. ZeiseDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2018
- Ctia - the Wireless Ass'n v. City of BerkeleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.