Ctia - the Wireless Ass'n v. City of Berkeley
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Concurrence
W. FLETCHER and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges,
concurring in the denial of the petition for rehearing en banc:
Our opinion largely speaks for itself. We held under Zauderer v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel, 471 U.S. 626, 105 S.Ct. 2265, 85 L.Ed.2d 652 (1985), that the City of Berkeley may compel “purely factual and uncontroversial” speech by a retailer at the point of sale. Our dissenting colleague would read Zauderer narrowly to permit compelled commercial speech only when it prevents consumer deception.
Four of our sister circuits have read Zauderer broadly to permit compelled commercial speech…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- New York State Restaurant Ass'n v. New York City Board of HealthCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- Discount Tobacco City & Lottery, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- 1-800-411-Pain Referral v. Richard Tollefson, D.C.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
- Safelite Group, Inc. v. JepsenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
- Public Citizen, Inc. v. Louisiana Attorney Disciplinary BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.