Legal Opinion

Hibberd v. Hughey

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 13, 1923No. 23412PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Redick, District Judge.

Appellant was allowed compensation by the commissioner, but the award was set aside :by the district court, and from that judgment claimant appeals.

The facts are that appellant was in the employ of Hibberd Brick Company engaged in the construction of a brick building for appellee Brigham. No insurance was procured by the contractors and so the owner is joined. Appellant was employed as a common laborer and his work just 'before the accident was carrying mud boards from one part of the building to another, on the second floor. A material hoist was being installed,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Larke v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
  2. Eugene Dietzen Co. v. Industrial BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Fournier's CaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1921
  4. Decatur Railway & Light Co. v. Industrial BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Westman's CaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1919

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Fowler v. Baalmann, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1950
  2. Enfield v. the Certain-Teed Prod. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  3. Grant County Service Bureau, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Rautio v. International Harvester Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  5. Moise v. Fruit Dispatch Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1939

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API