Legal Opinion
Oslin v. State
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided January 30, 1996No. C1-95-1579, C8-95-1580PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRIPPEN, Judge.
In this consolidated appeal, Sanda Oslin and Mary Wiese, former employees of the St. Peter Regional Treatment Center, appeal from summary judgments entered on their civil law claims against respondents, the State of Minnesota and its Department of Human Services, for battery, defamation, negligent supervision and retention, and negligent infliction of emotional distress, stemming from actions by two supervisory employees. We affirm.
FACTS
Appellants were employed by the St. Peter Regional Treatment Center, a state institution owned and operated by respondent Department of…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Rico v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
- Ponticas v. K.M.S. InvestmentsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Continental Can Co. Ex Rel. Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Hudson v. Snyder Body, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Germann v. F.L. Smithe MacHine Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Gleason v. Metropolitan Council Transit OperationsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
- Grozdanich v. Leisure Hills Health Center, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1998
- Bruchas v. Preventive Care, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- Gordon Ex Rel. Gordon v. Ottumwa Community School DistrictDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 2000
- Smith v. DataCard Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1998
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.