Legal Opinion

Clay v. BMC West Truss Plant

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided September 28, 1995No. 21335PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHROEDER, Justice.

BMC West Truss Plant appeals from an Industrial Commission decision in favor of Bruce J. Clay’s claim for unemployment benefits. BMC appeals the Industrial Commission’s conclusions that: (1) Clay did not voluntarily quit his employment; (2) Clay was discharged from employment but not for misconduct; and (3) Clay is able to work, and available for and seeking suitable work.

I

BACKGROUND AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS

BMC West Truss Plant (BMC) owns and operates a truss manufacturing plant in Idaho Falls. Bruce J. Clay (Clay), was employed by BMC as a sawyer at the plant. Trusses are…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Puckett v. Idaho Department of CorrectionsIdaho Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Doran v. Employment Security AgencyIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Laundry v. Franciscan Health Care CenterIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Campbell v. Bonneville County Board of CommissionersIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Steffen v. Davison, Copple, Copple & CoppleIdaho Supreme Court · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Uhl v. Ballard Medical Products, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Edwards v. Independence Services, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Copper v. Ace Hardware/Sannan, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Qualman v. State, Dept. of EmploymentIdaho Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Keller v. Ameritel Inns, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API