Legal Opinion

Copper v. Ace Hardware/Sannan, Inc.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 2016No. 42873-2015PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EISMANN, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order of the Industrial Commission that the Appellant is not entitled to unemployment benefits because he was discharged for misconduct in connection with his employment for violating his employer’s written policies. We affirm the order of the Commission.

I

Factual Background.

Clarence L. Copper (“Claimant”) was an employee of Ace Hardware/Sannan, Inc. (“Employer”), from March 5, 2004, until he was terminated on July 1, 2014. Prior to that date, Claimant was reprimanded numerous times for failing to perform his job duties. About one week before his…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dietz v. Minidoka County Highway DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Smith v. Zero Defects, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Clay v. BMC West Truss PlantIdaho Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Kivalu v. Life Care Centers of AmericaIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Stark v. ASSISTED LIVING CONCEPTS, INC.Idaho Supreme Court · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Harper v. Idaho Department of LaborIdaho Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Hennig, Jr. v. Money Metals ExchangeIdaho Supreme Court · 2024
  3. Shumway v. IDOLIdaho Supreme Court · 2023
  4. Weible v. Idaho Department of LaborIdaho Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API