Legal Opinion

Bolling Company v. Barrington Company

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 21, 1965No. 32033PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TOWNSEND, Commissioner.

In 1955 the parties hereto entered into a contract in which defendant appointed plaintiff its exclusive agent in the procuring of programs to be broadcast over a radio station operated by defendant. Compensation of plaintiff was stated in terms of a percentage of “the net amount of all national business accepted and carried by us originating in the United States” with the exception of “Business originating from the State of Missouri” and “Business which is currently under contract to us.” The agreement provided for automatic renewal from year to year unless one of the…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. ConeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
  2. Berthold-Jennings Lumber Co. v. St. Louis, I. M. & S. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
  3. Dawes v. StarrettSupreme Court of Missouri · 1935
  4. Scrivner v. American Car and Foundry Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1932
  5. Fuller v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1910

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Lawton v. Jewish Hospital of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Killian Construction Co. v. Tri-City Construction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Kemp v. Pinal CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  4. Sigrist by and Through Sigrist v. ClarkeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. State v. StephensMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API