Legal Opinion

Verline v. Hyssop

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1940No. 27701PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlake, C. J.

The plaintiffs are the owners of a hotel—building and furnishings—in Harrington. They leased the property to the defendants for a five-year term beginning May 15, 1937, at a monthly rental of fifty dollars, payable in advance on the fifteenth day of each month of the term. The defendants covenanted “to pay . . . the . . . rent in the manner . . . specified.” They defaulted, however, in the payment of the installment of rent due on October 15, 1938.

Subsequent to that date, they were notified by the lessors to pay the rent within ten days or surrender possession. The defendants did neither. On…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Income Properties Investment Corp. v. TrefethenWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Lewiston Water & Power Co. v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Carlson v. CurranWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Gustin v. KlingenbergWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Columbus Varnish Co. v. Seattle Paint Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Woodward v. BlanchettWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Petsch v. WillmanWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Kent School District No. 415 v. LadumCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API