Carlson v. Curran
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Huston, J., entered December 9, 1905, upon findings in favor of the defendants after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, dismissing an action of forcible entry and detainer.
1Opinion of the CourtRudkin, J.
— On the first day of December, 1890, Charles Meuhlenbruch and wife were the owners of the premises in *648controversy in this action, and on that- date leased a portion thereof to the defendant, J. C. Cnrran for the, purpose of erecting certain buildings thereon, which the lessee was authorized to remove on the expiration or termination of the lease. On the 31st day of August, 1901, the plaintiff Inga Carlson obtained a tax deed for the premises from the county treasurer of Pierce county, and on the same day served a written notice on the defendant J. C. Curran to the effect that she was the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Lewiston Water & Power Co. v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1906
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hanson v. CarrWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- Meyer v. BeyerWashington Supreme Court · 1906
- Monroe v. StaytWashington Supreme Court · 1910
- Wootton v. BishopCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
- Verline v. HyssopWashington Supreme Court · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.