Columbus Varnish Co. v. Seattle Paint Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Tallman, J., entered March 18, 1918, upon findings in favor of the defendant, in an action on contract, tried to the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMorris, J.
Appellant brought this action, seeking to recover upon account of goods sold and delivered/ Respondent filed a complicated answer, in which reference seems to be made to several defenses not altogether consistent; but, in the main, the answer is a plea that no liability should be enforced against defendant because of the failure of appellant to comply with the contract of sale in several particulars. This answer was not moved against in any way, appellant filing a reply to it, and the case proceeded to trial without a jury. The difficulty of making a clear statement of what the real issue was…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Bradley v. Donovan-Pattison Realty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915
- Verline v. HyssopWashington Supreme Court · 1940