Legal Opinion
Petsch v. Willman
Washington Supreme Court
Decided October 30, 1947No. 30244PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.
There are two questions presented on this appeal. The first we will state in the language of the respondent:
“Can a lessor, under a written term lease, sue for possession of the leased premises under Section 785 Remington’s Revised Statutes in the guise of an action to quiet title to the leased premises when the default alleged is a nonpayment of a monthly rental, without complying with Section 812(3) Remington’s Revised Statutes requiring three days notice to the lessee to ‘quit or pay rent’?”
The answer to that question is yes. We have held several times that one having the right to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ralph v. LomerWashington Supreme Court · 1891
- Lewiston Water & Power Co. v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1906
- State ex rel. Waterman v. Superior Court for Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1923
- Gustin v. KlingenbergWashington Supreme Court · 1937
- Johnson v. ChittendenWashington Supreme Court · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kessler v. NielsenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
- Woodward v. BlanchettWashington Supreme Court · 1950
- Shoemaker v. ShaugCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971
- Hill v. HillCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
- Durrah v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.