Kokosing Construction Co. v. Dixon
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Grady, Judge.
Plaintiff-Appellant, Kokosing Construction Co. (Kokosing), appeals the trial court’s decision denying it injunctive relief and ordering the city of Dayton to execute a construction contract with Shook, Inc. (Shook). The trial court found that Dayton acted within its discretion in rejecting Kokosing’s bid, but abused its discretion in rejecting Shook’s bid as nonresponsive as its affirmative-action statement was not signed. The court characterized this omission a “clerical oversight” that gave Shook no competitive advantage in the bidding process.
Kokosing appeals this decision,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Cedar Bay Construction, Inc. v. City of FremontOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- City of Dayton, ex rel. Scandrick v. City of Dayton Mayor McGeeOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- Sandusky Properties v. AveniOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Weiner v. Cuyahoga Community College DistrictOhio Supreme Court · 1969
- Pincelli v. Ohio Bridge Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1966
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Danis Clarkco Landfill Co. v. Clark County Solid Waste Management DistrictOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Danis Clarkco Landfill Co. v. Clark Cty. Solid Waste Mgt. Dist.Ohio Supreme Court · 1995
- BFI Waste Systems v. City of Garfield HeightsOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
- Prime Contractors, Inc. v. City of GirardOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
- Smith & Johnson Construction Co. v. Ohio Department of TransportationOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.