Legal Opinion

Pincelli v. Ohio Bridge Corp.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1966No. 39379PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

The judgment below dismissing the appeal on questions of law and fact and retaining it on questions of law *44cannot be prejudicial since only questions of law arose in the Court of Appeals. We are unable to see any question of fact material at any stage of these proceedings which was disputed in the courts below. Nor was any additional material evidence proffered and excluded in the Court of Appeals.

There is no reason for a Court of Appeals to certify its judgment as conflicting with that of another Court of Appeals where, as here, the point upon which conflict exists had no arguable effect…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sprung v. E. I. Dupont de Nemours & Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1939
  2. Sprung, Admx. v. E. I. Du Pont De NemoursOhio Supreme Court · 1939

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Cedar Bay Construction, Inc. v. City of FremontOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State ex rel. WBNS TV, Inc. v. DuesOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Lathrop Co. v. City of ToledoOhio Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Brown v. Borchers Ford, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Kokosing Construction Co. v. DixonOhio Court of Appeals · 1991

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API