Sandusky Properties v. Aveni
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
This cause stems from an action for specific performance and accounting for rents and profits. It is without question that an action for specific performance, any accounting that might be ancillary to it, and the award of any damages that may under the circumstances appear to be necessary, are matters in equity and may be determined by the trial court in its sound discretion. Quarto Mining Co. v. Litman (1975), 42 Ohio St. 2d *27573, 87 [71 O.O.2d 58]; Sternberg v. Bd. of Trustees (1974), 37 Ohio St. 2d 115, 118 [66 O.O.2d 257]; 49 Ohio Jurisprudence 2d (1961) 493, Specific Performance, Section 5.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- Rohde v. FarmerOhio Supreme Court · 1970
- Steiner v. CusterOhio Supreme Court · 1940
- Pembaur v. LeisOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- City of Dayton, ex rel. Scandrick v. City of Dayton Mayor McGeeOhio Supreme Court · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- Mark v. Mellott Manufacturing Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1995
- Byers v. Robinson, 08ap-204 (9-23-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- McCarthy v. LippittOhio Court of Appeals · 2002
- D.G.M., Inc. v. Cremeans Concrete & Supply Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1996
- Four Howards, Ltd. v. J & F Wenz Road Investment, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.