Legal Opinion

Sandusky Properties v. Aveni

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1984No. 83-1970PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Per curiam

This cause stems from an action for specific performance and accounting for rents and profits. It is without question that an action for specific performance, any accounting that might be ancillary to it, and the award of any damages that may under the circumstances appear to be necessary, are matters in equity and may be determined by the trial court in its sound discretion. Quarto Mining Co. v. Litman (1975), 42 Ohio St. 2d *27573, 87 [71 O.O.2d 58]; Sternberg v. Bd. of Trustees (1974), 37 Ohio St. 2d 115, 118 [66 O.O.2d 257]; 49 Ohio Jurisprudence 2d (1961) 493, Specific Performance, Section 5.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Rohde v. FarmerOhio Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Steiner v. CusterOhio Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Pembaur v. LeisOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  5. City of Dayton, ex rel. Scandrick v. City of Dayton Mayor McGeeOhio Supreme Court · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. Mark v. Mellott Manufacturing Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Byers v. Robinson, 08ap-204 (9-23-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. McCarthy v. LippittOhio Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. D.G.M., Inc. v. Cremeans Concrete & Supply Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Four Howards, Ltd. v. J & F Wenz Road Investment, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API