Legal Opinion
Smith & Johnson Construction Co. v. Ohio Department of Transportation
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided June 30, 1998No. 97APE1O-1401PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
John C. Young, Judge.
Appellants, Smith & Johnson Construction Co. and Robert Johnson (“Smith-Johnson”), appeal to this court from the trial court’s decision adopting the magistrate’s recommendation to deny appellants’ motions for declaratory and injunctive relief from appellee Ohio Department of Transportation’s (“ODOT’s”), award of a $3,818,130 road improvement contract to appellee R.F. Scurlock Company (“Scurlock”). See ODOT Tabulation of Bids dated December 31, 1996. The record reflects the following: The contract awarded concerns project No. 888(96), which was to improve a 1.51 kilometer…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- Cedar Bay Construction, Inc. v. City of FremontOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- Leaseway Distribution Centers, Inc. v. Department of Administrative ServicesOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
- Control Data Corp. v. Controlling BoardOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
- Hardrives Paving & Construction, Inc. v. City of NilesOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gaeta v. Ridley School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- BECDIR Construction Co. v. ProctorOhio Court of Appeals · 2001