Legal Opinion

Pierce v. Hower

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1895No. 17,583PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Erom the Wells Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHoward, J.

This was an action by the appellees to set aside as fraudulent a conveyance of real estate from the appellant, John S. Pierce, to his wife, the appellant,' Sarah M. Pierce. The court found the conveyance-fraudulent as to the undivided four-fifths of the land, and judgment was entered accordingly.

It is contended that each paragraph of the complaint-is defective for want of an’allegation that, at the time of the bringing of the action, the appellant John S. Pierce' did not have sufficient property, subject to execution, to pay appellees’ claim. The allegation made is, > “That at the time of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kitts v. WillsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Hubler v. PullenIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
  3. Hirsch v. NortonIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Minnich v. ShafferIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Baker v. KistlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1859

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Rioux v. CroninMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
  2. Huffman v. HuffmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
  3. Kedey v. PettyIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Borror v. CarrierIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
  5. Clements v. DoakNebraska Supreme Court · 1941

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API