Legal Opinion

Rioux v. Cronin

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 15, 1915PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C. J.

These two suits in equity, each brought by a separate judgment creditor of Patrick J. Cronin, come before us *133by the defendants’ appeals after final decrees for the plaintiffs entered upon the findings of a master. The evidence is not reported except as a part of it appears in the master’s findings. The facts disclosed in the master’s report must stand as true. Cook v. Scheffreen, 215 Mass. 444.

The finding of the master to the effect that the conveyance by Patrick J. Cronin of real estate in Holyoke to his wife, Ellen Cronin, was without consideration and intended to delay, defeat and defraud…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Metcalf v. BarkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. Miller v. SherrySupreme Court of the United States · 1865
  3. Humes v. ScruggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  4. Howe v. HoweMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  5. Jordan v. OsgoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Moss v. Old Colony Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  2. Attorney General v. PelletierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  3. Lorando v. GethroMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  4. Glover v. Waltham Laundry Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  5. Foster v. EvansMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API