Legal Opinion

O'Neil v. Goldenetz

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1938No. Civil No. 4023PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

This is an appeal by the State Tax Commission, hereinafter called defendant, from a judgment in favor of Frank Goldenetz, hereinafter called plaintiff. The facts of the case are not seriously in dispute, and may be stated as follows, the real question being the legal inferences to be drawn therefrom.

In 1935 the legislature, at its regular session, adopted chapter 79 which reads, so far as material, as follows:

“Section 1. Horse-racing and dog-racing meets; application for permit; fee. Horse-racing and dog-racing meets may be held in this state only in the manner provided herein. Any person,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brutinel v. NygrenArizona Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Lois Grunow Memorial Clinic v. DavisArizona Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Windes v. FrohmillerArizona Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Wiggins v. KerbyArizona Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United Bank v. Mesa N. O. Nelson Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Millett v. FrohmillerArizona Supreme Court · 1948
  3. State of Arizona v. AngleArizona Supreme Court · 1939
  4. State Ex Rel. Dean v. BrandjordMontana Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Aritex Land Company v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API