Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Dean v. CITY COURT, ETC.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 12, 1979No. 2 CA-CIV 3114PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, Judge.

Appellee Lichtenstein received a traffic citation for making a left-hand turn in her automobile onto Third Street, which runs east and west, from Tucson Boulevard, which runs north and south, in violation of traffic control signs reading “No Turn” and “Do Not Enter”. This portion of Third Street, is the main bicycle route to the University of Arizona and the City of Tucson has passed ordinances and posted signs prohibiting automobiles from turning onto it from certain main north-south arteries. Turns can be made onto Third Street from other north-south streets in the area.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Campbell v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Welton v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. United States v. Honorable Irving Hill, United States District JudgeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
  4. Fenton v. HowardArizona Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Matter of De LuccaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Richard Hurles v. Charles L. RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  2. Dream Palace v. County of MaricopaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  3. Bilagody v. ThorneycroftCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
  4. Hurles v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
  5. Richard Hurles v. Charles L. RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API