Legal Opinion
United States v. Honorable Irving Hill, United States District Judge
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 30, 1973No. 71-2485PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge:
The Government seeks writs of mandamus directing respondent judge to vacate his order dismissing indictments in cases pending before him in the District Court of the United States for the Central District of California. [United States of America v. Linetsky, et al., No. 7145; United States of America v. Carlo, et al., No. 7142].
FACTS
On December 22, 1970, a 36-count indictment was returned against Linetsky and others charging, in substance, one or more of the defendants, real parties in interest here, with violations of Title 18 U.S.C. § 1461, in knowingly depositing…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Fong Foo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. OppenheimerSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- United States v. KisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Serfass v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. Albert GoldsteinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- United States v. Inmon, Martel A/K/A MartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Blondes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- United States v. Ronald S. JenkinsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.