Legal Opinion
Hurles v. Superior Court
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided April 1, 1993No. 1 CA-SA 93-0046PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FIDEL, Chief Judge.
This petition for special action presents a significant threshold question of standing, which we publish this order to address.
The petition arises from a first degree murder prosecution in which the State seeks the death penalty. 1 The defendant petitioner is indigent and represented by appointed counsel. Defendant maintains that he is entitled to two lawyers, not one, in defending a capital case, and asks us to find that the trial judge abused her discre tion by declining to appoint him a second lawyer.
The real party in interest is the State of Arizona, represented…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Fenton v. HowardArizona Supreme Court · 1978
- Knapp v. HardyArizona Supreme Court · 1974
- State Ex Rel. Dean v. CITY COURT, ETC.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
- Dunn v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
3Cited by25 opinions
- Richard Hurles v. Charles L. RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Bergeron Ex Rel. Perez v. O'NEILCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
- Riley, Hoggatt & Suagee, P.C. v. EnglishArizona Supreme Court · 1993
- Richard Hurles v. Charles L. RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- State v. ArellanoArizona Supreme Court · 2006
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.