Legal Opinion

Spuglio v. Cugini

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 27, 2003PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Per curiam

¶ 1 This appeal has been taken from the orders of October 23, 2002(1) sustaining the preliminary objections of Appellees, Roseanna Cugini (Cugini) and Underwriters at Lloyd’s London (Underwriters) to Appellant’s first amended complaint and dismissing the complaint and any cross-claims filed against them with prejudice; and (2) granting the preliminary objections of Appellee, Philadelphia Suburban Water Company to Appellant’s first amended complaint and striking with *1287prejudice all claims and references to Poorna Spuglio, Sharleen Spuglio and Krista Spuglio, and striking with prejudice all…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rush v. Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. American Independent Insurance v. E.S. Ex Rel. CrespoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Bell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Grimm, R. v. Grimm, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  2. Commonwealth v. CulsoirSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  3. Druot v. CoulterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  4. AIA American Insurance v. Buyakowski, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
  5. Beaver River Rails v. Geneva CollegeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API