Legal Opinion

Bell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 3, 1993No. 442PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPOVICH, Judge:

This case concerns an appeal from the December 31, 1992, order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County granting in part the preliminary objections to the complaint of the plaintiffs/appellants (Dr. Robert Bell & Yeon Choi). We quash.

On October 6, 1992, the plaintiffs (Yeon Choi, as the insured/injured party, and Dr. Robert Bell, as the medical provider) filed a two-count complaint against the defendant/appellee (State Farm Mutual Insurance Co.) claiming a breach of contract (Count I) for “failing] and refusing] to pay all ... first party benefits [under the Motor…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Pugar v. GrecoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Praisner v. StockerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Tagnani v. LewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Gordon v. Pennsylvania Blue ShieldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Smitley v. Holiday Rambler Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Hanson v. Federal Signal Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Prelude, Inc. v. JorcykSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. Spuglio v. CuginiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. Smaha v. LandyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API