Druot v. Coulter
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
¶ 1 This appeal has been taken from the order of November 14, 2007 granting the motion of appellees, defendants below, for summary judgment as to all counts of the complaint filed by appellants, plaintiffs below. The November 14th order did not dispose of any of the seven counterclaims filed by appellees in the trial court. Ap-pellees have filed a motion to quash this appeal as interlocutory. We grant Appel-lees’ motion to quash.
¶ 2 Prior to the 1992 amendment to Pa. R.A.P. 341(c), if the counterclaim was unrelated to the original complaint and the original plaintiff was “put out of…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Continental Bank v. Andrew Building Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Spuglio v. CuginiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Moore Motors, Inc. v. BeaudrySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
4Cited by9 opinions
- Callen, D. v. Foertsch, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2024
- Carlino East Brandywine v. Brandywine VillageSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Hueitt v. Philadelphia Media Holdings, LLC, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County2013
- Linde, E. v. Linde, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Lomuscio, F. v. Cole, H.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.