Legal Opinion

Fena v. Wickstrom

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 29, 1984No. C3-84-51PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

POPOVICH, Chief Judge.

Appellant appeals from a judgment of the trial court in favor of respondent dismissing appellant’s counterclaim. We affirm.

FACTS

On April 4, 1978, the parties executed a five year lease. The property leased consisted of the basement and first floor of a two story structure in which appellant operated a Ben Franklin variety store. The lease contained the following exculpatory clause:

The said Lessee agrees that the said Lessors shall not be holden or liable for any loss or damage which may be sustained by the said Lessee or others by reason of the freezing, bursting,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Blattner v. ForsterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  2. Schlobohm v. Spa Petite, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. Matter of Turners Crossroad Development Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  4. Starr v. StarrSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  5. Collins Truck Lines, Inc. v. Metropolitan Waste Control CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. FMC Corp. v. Northern Pump Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1987
  2. Groves v. Dakota Printing Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Reliable Metal, Inc. v. Shakopee Valley Printing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  4. Dobratz v. ThomsonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1990
  5. Finke v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API