Legal Opinion
FMC Corp. v. Northern Pump Co.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided August 20, 1987No. Civ. 4-84-1365PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DOTY, District Judge.
This action arises out of plaintiff FMC’s suit against defendant Northern Pump Company (“Pump”) for a declaratory judgment and recovery of response costs and future damages, pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. § 9601-9657, and under claims of contribution and indemnity. Jurisdiction is alleged under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1332. Pump has filed a third-party Complaint against third-party defendant, Northern Ordnance, Inc. (“Ordnance”) for a declaration in contribution and indemnity under…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- The State of New York v. Shore Realty Corp. And Donald LeograndeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Lewis v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- United States v. Conservation Chemical Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1985
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Southland Corp. v. Ashland Oil, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1988
- Bowen Engineering v. Estate of ReeveDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1992
- Purolator Products Corp. v. Allied-Signal, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1991
- Mobay Corp. v. Allied-Signal, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1991
- Versatile Metals, Inc. v. Union Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.