Legal Opinion
Finke v. State
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided September 6, 1994No. C1-94-406PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FORSBERG, Judge.
Outlot A of the Burnsville Millpond Second Addition Planned Unit Development (Millpond PUD) abuts Millpond Avenue, through which it enjoys indirect access to Cliff Road. As part of a government expansion of Trunk Highway 13 (T.H. 13) into a four lane highway, a median is being extended on Cliff Road. This median will prevent left turns from Cliff Road to Millpond Avenue, or from Millpond Avenue to Cliff Road, thereby reducing access between Cliff Road and outlot A of the Millpond PUD. Outlot A was excluded from condemnation proceedings because it does not abut Cliff…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hunt v. IBM Mid America Employees Federal Credit UnionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Turner v. Alpha Phi Sorority HouseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Nord v. HerreidSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Hendrickson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Alevizos v. Metropolitan Air. Com'n of Mpls. & St. P.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- C AND R STACY, LLC v. County of ChisagoCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
- Hiller v. County of AnokaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- Storms, Inc. v. Mathy Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015