Legal Opinion

Bedard & Musser v. City of Boise City

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided September 22, 2017No. Docket 44171PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRODY, Justice.

This ease involves a claim to quiet title. Plaintiffs Bedard and Musser, and Boise Hollow Land Holdings, RLLP (collectively referred to as Boise Hollow) filed suit against Boise City seeking a declaration that they: (1) hold an access easement over part of Quail Hollow Golf Course pursuant to a recorded Permanent Easement Agreement; and (2) are entitled to expand the easement area to comply with certain requirements of the Ada County Highway District so that it can be dedicated as a public road. The district court rejected Boise Hollow’s position on summary judgment, finding…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Shawver v. Huckleberry Estates, L.L.C.Idaho Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Thomson v. City of LewistonIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Wing v. MartinIdaho Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Akers v. D.L. White Construction, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Leichtfuss v. DabneyMontana Supreme Court · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Estate of Ekic v. GEICO Indem. Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Turcott v. Estate of BatesIdaho Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Budget Truck Sales, LLC v. TilleyIdaho Supreme Court · 2018
  4. 616 Inc. v. Mae Properties, LLCIdaho Supreme Court · 2023
  5. Cave Bay Community Services v. LohmanIdaho Supreme Court · 2026

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API