Legal Opinion
Estate of Ekic v. GEICO Indem. Co.
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided June 27, 2018No. Docket 45018PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BURDICK, Chief Justice.
Ibrahim and Halida Ekic (the Ekics) and the estate of Aldina Ekic appeal from the decisions of the Ada County district court to grant summary judgment to Geico Indemnity Company (Geico) on their claims of breach of contract, misrepresentations in the inducement, breach of the duty of good faith and fair dealing, and promissory estoppel and to award attorney fees to Geico. Geico requests attorney fees on appeal under Idaho Code section 41-1839.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Aldina Ekic purchased insurance from Geico in June 2013, with additional underinsured…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bach v. BagleyIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
- Smith v. MittonIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
- Uhl v. Ballard Medical Products, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. Thomas John KralovecIdaho Supreme Court · 2017
- Esser Electric v. Lost River Ballistics Technologies, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2008
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Idaho Dep't of Health & Welfare v. Doe (In Re Interest of Doe)Idaho Supreme Court · 2018
- State v. ZarinegarIdaho Supreme Court · 2020
- Westover v. Idaho Counties Risk Mgmt. ProgramIdaho Supreme Court · 2018
- Uzzle v. Estate of HirningIdaho Supreme Court · 2020
- Bergeman v. Select Portfolio ServicingIdaho Supreme Court · 2018
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.