Legal Opinion

Swainston v. Intermountain Health Care, Inc.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1988No. 870312, 870319PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURHAM, Justice:

Intermountain Health Care (IHC) appeal from the trial court’s order denying its motion to disqualify the firm of Howard, Lewis & Petersen (the Howard firm) from the present action. Following a hearing on the motion, the trial court ruled that IHC was collaterally estopped from litigating its motion because a similar motion had previously been litigated in a case in federal court. We reverse and remand.

Plaintiffs filed the present medical malpractice action on March 9, 1984. The Howard firm appeared as counsel on June 25, 1984, after plaintiffs’ original counsel withdrew from…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Original Ballet Russe, Ltd. v. Ballet Theatre, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
  2. Keith B. Redd, D/B/A Abajo Petroleum v. Shell Oil Company, in the Matter of Michael W. Graney, Attorney for Shell Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
  3. Donahue v. Susquehanna Collieries Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1943
  4. Searle Bros. v. SearleUtah Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Margulies Ex Rel. Margulies v. UpchurchUtah Supreme Court · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. MacRis & Associates, Inc. v. Neways, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2000
  2. MacK v. Utah State Department of CommerceUtah Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Beaver v. Qwest, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Murdock v. Springville Municipal Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Salt Lake City v. Mark C. HaikUtah Supreme Court · 2017

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API