Legal Opinion

Salt Lake City v. Mark C. Haik

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 2017No. Case No. 20160019PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On Direct Appeal

Justice Himonas,

opinion of the Court:

INTRODUCTION

¶ 1 In 1997, Mark Haik litigated a lawsuit in federal court based on strikingly similar facts to the one that he now seeks to pursue in the third distinct, and he lost on the merits. See Haik v. Town of Alta, No. 974202, 1999 WL 190717, at *1 (10th Cir. Apr. 5, 1999). In 2012, Mr. Haik litigated a lawsuit in federal court based on exactly the same facts as the one before us, and he lost again. See Haik v. Salt Lake City Corp., 567 F.Appx. 621, 623 (10th Cir.2014). To be sure, Mr. Haik did not raise each and every legal claim in…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Taylor v. SturgellSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Semtek International Inc. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Yapp v. Excel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Haik v. JonesUtah Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Haskell v. Wakefield and AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2021
  3. Cheek v. Iron CountyUtah Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Pioneer Home v. TaxHawkCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019
  5. State v. BlakeUtah Supreme Court · 2025

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API