Legal Opinion

Murdock v. Springville Municipal Corp.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1999No. 960299PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZIMMERMAN, Justice:

¶ 1 This matter is before us as two separate appeals from two separate but parallel proceedings that involve the same parties and the same subject matter. Factually, this case involves a dispute between several water users (“petitioners”) and the city of Springville.1 The petitioners are all water rights holders. They own land in Springville *67and hold diligence rights to waters from a source in Spring Creek Canyon Creek (“Spring Creek”). Although the record is less than clear, it seems that the petitioners are all successors in interest to A.W. Cher-rington (“Cherrington”).…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State v. PenaUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  2. West v. Thomson NewspapersUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. DibelloUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Ryan v. Dan's Food Stores, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Penrod v. Nu Creation Creme, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1983

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Cabaness v. ThomasUtah Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Salo v. TylerUtah Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Golden Meadows Properties, LC v. StrandCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2010
  4. Raab v. Utah Railway Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Brigham Young University v. Tremco Consultants, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2005

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API