Legal Opinion

Evans v. McNutt

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 16, 1986No. C-83-10-152; CA A34960PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.

This is an action for personal injury. The trial court granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment, and plaintiff appeals. We affirm.

Under ORCP 47, summary judgment is proper if (1) the pleadings and depositions on file show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact, and (2) that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. On review, the record is viewed in the light most favorable to the party opposing the motion; here, the plaintiff. See Stanfield v. Laccoarce, 288 Or 659, 665, 607 P2d 177 (1980).

The facts set out by plaintiffs pleadings and deposition, and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dawson v. Payless for DrugsOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Stanfield v. LaccoarceOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Delacroix v. SandersOregon Supreme Court · 1959

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ault v. Del Var Properties, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  2. United Medical Laboratories v. BohnkeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  3. Jensen v. Costco Wholesale CorporationDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2024
  4. Poellot v. Walmart Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API