Legal Opinion

Poellot v. Walmart Inc.

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided April 2, 2020No. 6:18-cv-01961Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON STEPHANIE POELLOT, an individual, Case No. 6:18-cv-01961-MC Plaintiff, OPINION & ORDER V. WALMART INC., a foreign corporation, Defendants. MCSHANE, Judge: Defendant Walmart Inc. (“Walmart”) moves for summary judgment on Plaintiff Stephanie Poellot’s claims, arguing that no rational factfinder could find Walmart liable for the injuries sustained by Ms. Poellot. But because Walmart may have had notice of the potential danger their bathroom stall posed, Walmart’s Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 17, is DENIED. STANDARD OF REVIEW…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Wilk v. GeorgesOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Maas v. WillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  5. Glorioso v. NessCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API