Delacroix v. Sanders
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPeeey, J.
The plaintiff brought this action against the defendant to recover damages for personal injuries suffered by her as the result of a fall in defendant’s restaurant. The trial court sustained defendant’s motion for a directed verdict and the plaintiff appeals.
In considering the defendant’s motion, it was necessary for the trial court to accept the plaintiff’s evidence as true, together with every reasonable inference of fact that can be drawn therefrom and interpret this evidence in a light most favorable to her. Marr et al. v. Putnam, 196 Or 1, 246 P2d 509.
The evidence of the'plaintiff is as…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Marr v. PutnamOregon Supreme Court · 1952
- Saunders v. A. M. Williams & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1936
- Vinson v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1951
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kaufman v. FisherOregon Supreme Court · 1962
- McVaigh v. SandbergOregon Supreme Court · 1973
- Evans v. McNuttCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- Woulfe v. DurstOregon Supreme Court · 1965
- McVaigh v. SandbergOregon Supreme Court · 1973