Smallwood v. Eason
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Judge.
Before addressing any of the substantive issues posed by this appeal, we first contend with plaintiff appellants’ failure to compile a record on appeal in accordance with N.C.R. App. R 9 (1996). It is appellants’ duty and responsibility to see that the record is in proper form and complete. See State v. Alston, 307 N.C. 321, 341, 298 S.E.2d 631, 644 (1983); Tucker v. General Tel. Co. of the Southeast, 50 N.C. App. 112, 118, 272 S.E.2d 911, 9Í5 (1980). Plaintiffs have failed in this duty.
The record has been styled incorrectly, in that the index page lists Guilford County as the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Bountiful Brick Co. v. GilesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- State v. AlstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- Harless v. FlynnCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
- Allred v. Allred-Gardner, IncorporatedSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Bass v. Mecklenburg CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Choate v. Sara Lee ProductsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999