Legal Opinion

Baun v. Hudson

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided December 8, 1952No. 6489-APublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

FOLTA, District Judge.

Libelant, a seaman, seeks maintenance for the period of disability resulting from the aggravation of an old back injury while employed on respondent’s fishing vessel. Although the injury is apparently permanent, maintenance may be alloVed only for such period of time after the voyage ended as an improvement in his condition may reasonably be expected from nursing, care and medical treatment, 'Calmar S.S. Corp. v. Taylor, 303 U.S. 525, 58 S.Ct. 651, 82 L.Ed. 993, and recovery is sought in this case only to the end of the period of convalescence following libelant’s…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Calmar Steamship Corp. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Lindquist v. DilkesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
  3. Luksich v. MisetichCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944
  4. Ladjimi v. Pacific Far East Line, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1951
  5. Lewis v. American-Hawaiian S. S. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1943

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Baun v. The Ethel GDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API