Legal Opinion
Baun v. The Ethel G
District Court, D. Alaska
Decided November 30, 1954No. 7072-APublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOLTA, District Judge.
The questions presented are (1) whether an in personam judgment against the owner of the vessel for maintenance and cure is res judicata in a subsequent suit against the vessel based on the same claim, and (2) whether jurisdiction has been acquired over the res where libelant failed to have a notice of seizure published, and if not, whether the objection is available to the intervenor.
On December 8, 1952, the libelant obtained a decree for $804 against the owner of the vessel here involved for maintenance and cure, but was unsuccessful in his efforts to enfore…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Tabor v. The Cerro GordoDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1893
- Zaccaro v. The Brothers ApapDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1888
- The Eastern ShoreDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1928
- The BostonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania · 1881
- Baun v. HudsonDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1952
3Cited by4 opinions
- McLaughlin v. Dredge GloucesterDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1964
- Edward D. Pratt, Jr. v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1964
- USL Capital Ex Rel. Ford Motor Credit Co. v. the New York 30District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1996
- United States v. WhalenDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1964