Legal Opinion
Luksich v. Misetich
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 22, 1944No. 10522PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHENS, Circuit Judge.
Libellant brought suit against the four owners of the fishing vessel Lucky Star, including Domenic Misc.ich who was also master of the vessel, for maintenance and wages and for damages resulting from the master’s negligence in connection with an injury sustained while libellant was employed on board the boat. The district court found that there was no negligence on the part of respondents. However, it awarded libellant $350.39 for maintenance from the time of his injury until the time he had reached a maximum state of recovery, and $105.57 for his share of the proceeds…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- The OsceolaSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Calmar Steamship Corp. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- The Bouker No. 2Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
- Loverich v. Warner Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
- Skolar v. Lehigh Valley R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Farrell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Gypsum Carrier, Inc. v. William D. HandelsmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Medina v. EricksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- Vitco v. JoncichDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1955
- Seville v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.