Legal Opinion
Lindquist v. Dilkes
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided March 12, 1942No. 7788PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Circuit Judge.
The learned District Judge’s introductory statement of facts cannot be improved upon. We therefore quote from his opinion.
“Frank O. Lindquist, an able seaman 57 years of age, joined the crew of the barge ‘Exeter’ on April 15, 1939 without a physical examination. At that time, and since about 1920, he had been suffering from a urinary ailment. The symptoms of which consisted of frequency of desire accompanied by soreness upon urination, although it apparently did not interfere with his employment. On that day the barge left Philadelphia en route to Boston, but, due to…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Hurn v. OurslerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Calmar Steamship Corp. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Siler v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Armstrong Paint & Varnish Works v. Nu-Enamel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- The Bouker No. 2Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Dery v. WyerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- Aston Bartholomew v. Universe Tankships, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- David McCorpen v. Central Gulf Steamship CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- Jordine v. WallingCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
- Helen Reabe Sobosle v. United States Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.